A Superwall alternative for iOS: ship the paywall, don't manage it remotely
Superwall puts your paywall behind a remote config layer so a growth team can A/B test it without shipping a build. The Swift Kit takes the opposite bet: native SwiftUI paywall screens that live in your repo, wired to RevenueCat, that one person can read and change in an afternoon. Which is right comes down to how many people touch your paywall.
Last updated: June 2026
The Swift Kit is a Superwall alternative for iOS built for solo and small-team developers, sold once for $99 (unlimited commercial projects, lifetime updates, 14-day refund) instead of a usage- or revenue-tiered plan. Superwall is marketed as a remote paywall platform where you design and A/B test paywalls in a dashboard without shipping a new build; The Swift Kit ships native SwiftUI paywall screens wired to RevenueCat directly in your codebase, so iteration happens in Xcode rather than in a remote console. Pick remote config if a non-engineering growth team owns paywall experiments; pick shipped screens if one developer owns the whole funnel.
Why Developers Are Switching from Superwall to The Swift Kit
Your paywall is code you can read, not config you rent
Superwall's core value is decoupling the paywall from your binary so it lives in a remote dashboard. That's powerful for a growth team and opaque for a solo dev. The Swift Kit ships the paywall as plain SwiftUI screens in your repo — you open the file, change the copy, layout, or surface style, and rebuild. There's no second source of truth to keep in sync and nothing to reverse-engineer when something looks off.
One $99 payment instead of a plan that scales with you
The Swift Kit is $99 once for unlimited commercial projects with lifetime updates. Remote paywall platforms are typically priced on usage, impressions, or a percentage of revenue (Superwall's exact tiers vary and change over time), which means the tool gets more expensive precisely as your app succeeds. For a small team, a fixed cost you pay before launch is easier to reason about than a line item that grows with MRR.
The paywall is wired to RevenueCat, not a separate layer
The Swift Kit's paywall sits directly on RevenueCat for entitlements, multi-tier offerings, and restore — no remote-config intermediary between your screen and the purchase. You configure offerings in RevenueCat, render them in a native screen, and gate features off entitlements. One fewer system in the funnel means one fewer place to debug when a purchase doesn't unlock.
A paywall is one feature of a whole app, not a standalone tool
Superwall does paywalls. The Swift Kit gives you the paywall inside a complete starter: Supabase auth (including Sign in with Apple), three AI providers proxied server-side, a 5-layer design system, onboarding, push, and TelemetryDeck analytics. The paywall inherits your app's design system automatically instead of being styled in a disconnected editor, so it looks native because it is.
No vendor in your render path at runtime
Because the screens are shipped, your paywall renders even if a third-party config service is slow or down — there's no remote fetch deciding what the user sees. For a solo developer who can't watch a dashboard's status page, a paywall that's just SwiftUI in the bundle is one less runtime dependency to monitor.
The Swift Kit vs Superwall — Feature Comparison
| Feature | The Swift Kit | Superwall |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | $99 one-time, unlimited projects, lifetime updates | Usage/revenue-based plan (tiers vary, as of 2026) |
| Where the paywall lives | Native SwiftUI screens in your repo | Remote dashboard config |
| Edit paywall without shipping a build | Marketed as a core feature | |
| No-code A/B testing for non-engineers | Marketed as a core feature | |
| Entitlements / subscriptions backend | RevenueCat (multi-tier) | Integrates with RevenueCat / StoreKit |
| Inherits your app's design system | Yes, 5-layer DesignSystem.swift | Styled in a separate editor |
| Renders with no runtime third-party fetch | ||
| Full app scaffold (auth, AI, onboarding, push) | ||
| Best fit | Solo dev / small team owning the funnel | Growth team running frequent experiments |
When Superwall Is Still the Right Choice
We believe in honest recommendations. Here's when Superwall might still be better for you:
- You have a dedicated growth or marketing team that needs to launch and A/B test paywall variants weekly without waiting on an App Store review cycle — remote config is exactly what that workflow needs.
- Your paywall experimentation velocity is high enough that the cost of remote tooling is clearly paid back by lift, and you want non-engineers editing copy and layout independently.
- You already run a remote paywall platform across multiple apps and value a single dashboard for cross-app analytics and audience targeting more than keeping everything in one codebase.
“The Swift Kit ships its paywall on RevenueCat, so you keep RevenueCat's entitlements, offerings, and analytics — you just render them in native SwiftUI screens you own instead of behind a remote config layer.”
Based on publicly available documentation and pricing as of June 2026. Features and pricing may change.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Swift Kit a true Superwall replacement, or just a paywall template?
It replaces the part of Superwall most solo developers actually use: a designed, working paywall wired to purchases. What it does not replace is Superwall's remote-config and no-code A/B testing layer. If your reason for Superwall is shipping paywall changes without a build, The Swift Kit is not a drop-in swap; if your reason is 'I just need a good paywall connected to RevenueCat,' it covers that and the rest of the app too.
Can I still A/B test paywalls with The Swift Kit's shipped screens?
Yes, but you do it in code and ship the variants — for example, gating which paywall screen renders behind a feature flag or a RevenueCat offering, then measuring with TelemetryDeck. That requires an engineer and an App Store update for structural changes. It's slower than Superwall's remote experiments, which is the explicit trade-off of shipped screens versus remote config.
Does removing the remote layer mean I lose RevenueCat?
No. Superwall and The Swift Kit both sit on top of RevenueCat. The Swift Kit keeps RevenueCat for entitlements, multi-tier offerings, restore, and revenue analytics — it simply removes the remote paywall-config tool that would otherwise sit between RevenueCat and your screen. You configure products in RevenueCat exactly as before.
Why pick shipped paywall screens over remote config for a small team?
Because the whole value of remote config is letting people who can't ship a build change the paywall — and on a one- or two-person team, the person changing the paywall is the person shipping the build anyway. The decoupling buys you nothing and adds a second system, a runtime dependency, and an ongoing cost. Shipped SwiftUI screens collapse that back into one place you already work.
What does The Swift Kit cost compared to Superwall?
The Swift Kit is $99 one-time for unlimited commercial projects with lifetime updates and a 14-day refund. Superwall is marketed on a usage- or revenue-based plan whose exact tiers vary and change over time, so the cost grows as your app grows. For a pre-revenue or small app, a fixed upfront price is usually the cheaper and more predictable choice.
When is Superwall genuinely the better choice?
When a non-engineering growth team owns paywall experiments and needs to iterate weekly without App Store reviews. That workflow is what remote paywall platforms are built for, and no shipped-screen approach matches its velocity. If that describes your team, stay on Superwall — The Swift Kit is built for the opposite situation, where one developer owns the entire funnel.
Ready to ship your iOS app faster?
Get The Swift Kit — the complete SwiftUI boilerplate with the best integrations pre-wired. $99 one-time.
Get The Swift Kit — $99